POM / GLP-1
Weight-loss & GLP-1
Online pharmacies and telehealth funnels selling GLP-1, hair-loss POMs or weight-management programmes.
Pre-publication claim review for UK weight-loss and GLP-1 clinics, aesthetic clinics and the pharmacies and brands around them. Doctor-signed, on the record.
Reviewed against CAP Code MHRA Blue Guide GPhC standards ASA rulings GMC Good Medical Practice GB NHCR DMCC 2024
Rulings-watch the ASA ruled a supplement’s own name, “GuLP-1”, an unauthorised health claim, . Read the doctor-led note ›
Before you publish, we tell you whether each claim holds against the rule that governs it, and write the safer wording where it doesn’t. You go live on your own timeline, with a considered, signed view of where every claim stands.
Grade
Every public claim graded BLACK, RED, AMBER or GREEN against the cited rule.
Rewrite
Safer wording for every high-risk claim, documented against the cited rule.
Sign
Personally signed by a named, GMC-registered clinician who stands behind it. Not outsourced, not templated, not automated.
Where we go deepest: weight-loss and GLP-1 first, aesthetics alongside.
POM / GLP-1
Online pharmacies and telehealth funnels selling GLP-1, hair-loss POMs or weight-management programmes.
BOTOX / TOXIN
Single clinics and multi-site groups marketing botulinum toxin and POM-led treatments.
SUPPLEMENT / NHCR
DTC supplement, longevity and nootropic brands needing claims, testimonials and endorsements that survive consumer-protection rules.
Three full sample audits in the exact format of a live engagement. Built as illustrative composites, they model no real business and identify no one.
Pharmacy / Weight-management
Pharmacy page with named POMs, dose-tier pricing and GLP-1 signalling.
Review sample audit ›Aesthetics / Toxin
Clinic page with Botox naming, public pricing and before/after imagery.
Review sample audit ›Supplement / Longevity
DTC supplement pages with claim drift, quantified outcomes and testimonials.
Review sample audit ›Illustrative samples. Advisory and editorial only. No regulator endorsement implied. Verattia is a new practice and publishes no invented testimonials; founding engagements instead include the Re-validation round at no added fee, in exchange for consideration of an anonymised case study.
Seen the format? Send your asset for a Rapid Triage ›
Most start with a single audit, then move to ongoing sign-off.
Entry · 48 to 72 hours
From £750single asset
Directional review ahead of a launch, campaign or regulator reply. Publish, hold or escalate.
£300 credit against a Full Audit if commissioned within 14 days.
Lighter first step: Pre-Flight Check, from £350, one asset, 48 hours, checklist-based, credited in full toward a Full Audit. Start a Pre-Flight ›
Request a Rapid Risk TriageCore · 5 working days
From £1,950single asset
Complete claim-by-claim review. Every claim graded, every high-risk string rewritten, every remediation step sequenced.
Campaign · 7 to 10 working days
From £4,5003 to 5 linked assets
Landing, pricing, email and ads read in concert, as a regulator would.
Published figures are starting points. Every engagement is scoped and quoted to your asset before any work begins; single-asset audits typically run £1,950 to £3,500, multi-asset funnels £4,500 to £7,500.
Not ready for a paid review? Send one page and get a free two-line read: the single highest-risk line on it and the rule it engages, read personally by Dr Farzaneh. No charge, no follow-up unless you ask; a small number are read each week. Request a two-line read ›
Existing client or multi-site group? See ongoing & group engagements ›
Most brands publishing regularly move to a Monthly Sign-Off retainer; Re-validation and multi-site programmes sit alongside it.
After rebuild · 3 working days
From £750 per asset
Recurring · 48h per asset
£1,200 to £4,500 per month
Groups · 2 to 3 weeks
£9,500+ 6+ assets
Executive verdict, asset snapshot, claim audit table, regulatory narrative, safer-wording bank and a six-phase action plan. See an illustrative sample audit ›
Short answers buyers ask before commissioning.
No. A short brief, draft copy or screenshots is enough to scope the work.
Yes. One asset is one public page, one email sequence, one paid ad set or equivalent surface.
Executive verdict, asset snapshot, claim audit table, regulatory narrative, safer-wording bank and a six-phase action plan. 10 to 15 pages, doctor-signed.
No. Outputs are advisory and editorial; they do not imply regulator approval and do not replace legal counsel or prescriber governance. See Important limitations.
Every enquiry is read personally by Dr Borna Farzaneh, GMC-registered clinician and Founding Director.
Then the audit says so in writing, naming the rule each claim was tested against. It is a signed, dated record of the due diligence done: proof the asset was reviewed against each cited rule before publication, worth keeping on file if a complaint ever lands.
Published prices are starting points; your exact fee is quoted before any work begins, scoped to your asset. If your asset turns out to be larger than a single surface, you see the revised scope first, never a surprise invoice. Every Full Audit also includes one round of re-review on the wording you remediate.
Yes. A Rapid Risk Triage carries a £300 credit against a Full Claim-Risk Audit commissioned within 14 days. Most engagements begin with a Triage and escalate only where the findings justify it.
Yes. Everything you send is treated as confidential, and we counter-sign a mutual NDA before review on request.
Yes. Pre-publication is ideal, but a live page, paid ad or email sequence can be reviewed against the same frameworks. That is useful if a complaint has already landed.
Most claim risk in regulated health advertising turns on a medical judgment: whether a “clinically proven” claim is earned, whether a before and after implies a treatment outcome, whether a POM is being promoted to the public. Those are calls a GMC-registered clinician is trained to make, and the assessment is signed on the record.
A solicitor opines on legal exposure. This is a clinician reading the same claims against the advertising and medicines codes and signing the assessment. The two are complementary, not substitutes.
Use it; it is good, free and fast on the copy you choose to send. The audit answers a different question: which of the hundreds of lines across your site, ads and emails needed sending in the first place. Copy Advice responds to what you ask about; it does not proactively read your whole surface, write the safer wording at scale, or leave a doctor-signed, dated record for due diligence. Verattia audits cite CAP guidance throughout, and where free Copy Advice is the right tool, the audit says so.
Begin an engagement.
Outputs are advisory and editorial. Not legal, regulatory or medical advice. Full scope: Important limitations.